What do We Know and How do We Know It

One of my favorite jobs was as a planetarium director. I got to meet a good fraction of the fifth graders, and smaller fractions of other ages of students from a major metropolitan area. The best part, for me, was the free form question period at the end when the students got to ask anything about astronomy or physics.

A fundamental test of your scientific mojo is to ask yourself, or have someone else ask you, what do you know and how do you know it. I few good ones at the very fundamental level:

1)Everything is made of atoms (Feynman's nomination for the most important scientific fact). How do we know?

2)Every living thing is made of cells (easy) and all those cells are built on extremely similar designs (harder) and all almost certainly derive from a common ancestor (hard).

3)The Sun is a star, and the other stars are very far away.

4)The Earth and the other planets orbit the Sun under the influence of gravity.(easy for physicists, I hope!)

5)The Americas used to be connected to Europe and Africa. India and Australia used to be near the South Pole.

6)Carbon usually forms covalent bonds with up to four other atoms. When it forms covalent bonds with four other atoms they wind up at the vertices of a tetrahedron centered on the carbon atom.

(7)Exp[i*theta] = cos(theta) + i* sin (theta)

More nominations welcomed, preferably not too esoteric.

Because I like this type of question, I always thought parenthood would be a perfect job in answering how and why questions. Unfortunately for this theory, my kids were so clever that they usually figured out nearly everything for themselves - at least that's the way the proud parent remembers it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anti-Libertarian: re-post

The most pointed critique of social security and liberalism in general is the libertarian critique. The problem with libertarians, for a liberal, is that we have too much in common. We both believe in individual rights, tolerance of individual differences, and dislike government prescription of religion. The basic difference, it seems to me, is the different answers we give to Cain's (with thanks to the Captain - my original version had the corpse asking the question!) famous question: "Am I my brother's keeper?" That's not really my basic bitch against the libertarians though. My real complaint is the same as my complaint against most religion - its premise is a fraud. For those who can't stand to wait for the punchline, I believe that trying to implement libertarian principles leads to tyranny or social disintegration. Demonstrating that takes some historical (and pre-historical) context. For all but the last 15,000 or so of the 100,000 years the human spec...
Read more

Uneasy Lies The Head

Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown ........... Shakespeare Henry IV, Part II. So it is with us and our slightly distant primate cousins , so it seems. A 9-year study of wild baboons in Kenya by Princeton University and the Institute of Primate Research may turn conventional assumptions of alphas males upside down. The study found that alpha males have high testosterone levels, which allows them to dominate other baboons, get access to more food, and attract better mates. This is expected. Surprisingly, though, the alpha males also have high levels of stress hormone glucocorticoid, which scientists measured from their feces samples. In fact, the stress of alpha baboons was on par with low-ranking baboons. The convention wisdom is that access to food and females provides life security and thus less stress for dominant males. Conversely, weak males who are constantly threatened by starvation and physical violence from stronger males are thought to be more stressed. The st...
Read more

We Call it Soccer

The US played its best, and maybe only good game of World Cup, but lost thanks to brilliant goalkeeping by the Swedish keeper and the bizarre method soccer uses to settle ties when three US stars could not put the ball on frame from the 12 yard spot.  At the end it came down to a blocked shot that spun in by maybe a couple of centimeters. Well, that's football - too much like life.   Which brings me to a modest proposal.  Replace the thirty minute overtimes with as many 7-player 15 minute periods as needed to settle it.  Scoring should be much easier with fewer players.
Read more