Hilbert Space: Reply to James

I wanted a bit more space here, since you guys are teaching me a lot.

James wrote:

The most common states in your Hilbert spaces don't actually live there: such as position and momentum states. Rigged HS combines a nice space (physically realistic - nice and smooth), with your HS, and the nasty (generalised functions usually) dual of the nice guys.


James, I don’t dispute your mathematical point, and perhaps I misunderstood it, but when you said that position and momentum states don’t live in the Hilbert space, I assumed that you meant that it was position and momentum eigenstates that didn’t live in the HS. My point was that real physical systems can’t be prepared in position or momentum eigenstates (i.e., with infinitely precise position or momentum) – they are always superpositions with some uncertainty in both position and momentum. Those superpositions, I think, can and do live in the Hilbert space – or am I totally confused on this point?

I hadn’t heard of a “rigged Hilbert space” previously, but if I understood Wikipedia on the subject, it’s pretty much just Hilbert space augmented by the necessary mathematical machinery to implement Dirac delta functions and permit us to do calculus with them. Is that right?

The "rigging" (or additional structure) is made necessary by the bad behavior (not square integrable) of the Dirac delta functions corresponding to position and momentum eigenvalues, but these can't be prepared anyway - a precise position requires infinite momentum uncertainty and vice versa.

Nice Article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics

James later wrote:

Classical mechanics is a fibre bundle: the base maifold R^1 (time) and the fibre space (E^3). Or we could go Lagrangian with relaivity where a n-D system becomes 2D-d, (or we could Legendre Trans his and go H) but the point is that none of this fancy geometric-ballet will make classical stuff quantum-mechanical...


Consider the following:

Hermann Weyl, discussing the Hamiltonian formulation of quantum mechanics (The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics, pg. 95, Dover edition):

It is a universal trait of quantum theory to retain all the relations of classical physics; but whereas the latter interpreted these relations as conditions to which the values of physical quantities were subject to in all individual cases, the former interprets them as conditions on the quantities themselves, or rather on the Hermitian matrices which represent them...

I think for our purposes we would replace “matrices” with “operators in Hilbert space,” but he is making a very specific claim about the relation between the classical formulation and the quantum. My interpretation: the symplectic manifold of state vectors in Hamiltonian classical mechanics becomes a structure on the operators in Hilbert space – does that make mathematical sense? If I understand correctly, that's why Lie groups are fundamental to QM.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anti-Libertarian: re-post

The most pointed critique of social security and liberalism in general is the libertarian critique. The problem with libertarians, for a liberal, is that we have too much in common. We both believe in individual rights, tolerance of individual differences, and dislike government prescription of religion. The basic difference, it seems to me, is the different answers we give to Cain's (with thanks to the Captain - my original version had the corpse asking the question!) famous question: "Am I my brother's keeper?" That's not really my basic bitch against the libertarians though. My real complaint is the same as my complaint against most religion - its premise is a fraud. For those who can't stand to wait for the punchline, I believe that trying to implement libertarian principles leads to tyranny or social disintegration. Demonstrating that takes some historical (and pre-historical) context. For all but the last 15,000 or so of the 100,000 years the human spec...
Read more

Uneasy Lies The Head

Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown ........... Shakespeare Henry IV, Part II. So it is with us and our slightly distant primate cousins , so it seems. A 9-year study of wild baboons in Kenya by Princeton University and the Institute of Primate Research may turn conventional assumptions of alphas males upside down. The study found that alpha males have high testosterone levels, which allows them to dominate other baboons, get access to more food, and attract better mates. This is expected. Surprisingly, though, the alpha males also have high levels of stress hormone glucocorticoid, which scientists measured from their feces samples. In fact, the stress of alpha baboons was on par with low-ranking baboons. The convention wisdom is that access to food and females provides life security and thus less stress for dominant males. Conversely, weak males who are constantly threatened by starvation and physical violence from stronger males are thought to be more stressed. The st...
Read more

We Call it Soccer

The US played its best, and maybe only good game of World Cup, but lost thanks to brilliant goalkeeping by the Swedish keeper and the bizarre method soccer uses to settle ties when three US stars could not put the ball on frame from the 12 yard spot.  At the end it came down to a blocked shot that spun in by maybe a couple of centimeters. Well, that's football - too much like life.   Which brings me to a modest proposal.  Replace the thirty minute overtimes with as many 7-player 15 minute periods as needed to settle it.  Scoring should be much easier with fewer players.
Read more