If you want to get into university in the US, especially a highly ranked or elite university, you probably need to take either the SAT or ACT exams. These are slightly different test of your language, mathematical and a few other skills and talents. They have traditionally been one of the main filters used to select the elect and the damned, college wise.
These exams have been heavily criticised, mostly for the fact that some disadvantaged minorities do poorly on them compared to children of the wealthy and others willing and able to pay for elite high schools and expensive test preparation. As a result, many elite schools have multiple standards for admission. If you are a disadvantaged minority or an advantaged legacy (child of graduates) your score is treated as if it were maybe a couple of hundred points higher. One the other hand, if you are Asian, subtract a hundred points or so.
A few year back, the gigantic California University system was subjected to a new State law that made it illegal to consider race in admissions. The result was that the elite universities filled up with talented and hard working Asian students and disadvantaged minorities were largely excluded.
In response to the resulting ethnic disparities, the UC system very recently decided to ban use of the SAT and ACT. Of course this leaves the problem of how to choose the winners of the coveted slots at the elite schools. Apparently this leaves high school grades as the deciding filter. If you suspect that this might lead to rampant grade inflation, you might suffer from the same cynical bent as your humble correspondent.
Meanwhile, the UC will try to come up with its own race fair system. Good luck trying to find a test that won't favor those with the resources and willingness to pay for high quality test prep.
Popular posts from this blog
The coverup is in full swing. Check out Josh Marshall : At first the evidence was scattered and anecdotal. But now it's pretty clear that a key aim of the Bush administration's takeover of the NOLA situation is to cut off press access to report the story. And this from Kevin Drum , including this quote: At the National Guard checkpoint, they are under orders to turn away all media. All of the reporters are turning they’re TV trucks around." from Bob Brigham Impeach Bush. Do it now!
According to a new ABC poll , 74% of Republicans approve of Bush's handling of the Katrina disaster, and only 47% of all Americans disapprove. Via Kevin Drum , the Army Corps of Engineers knew of the Levee breach early Monday , and FEMA has been busy preventing aid from getting to New Orleans . At what point does incompetence shade into genocide?
The most pointed critique of social security and liberalism in general is the libertarian critique. The problem with libertarians, for a liberal, is that we have too much in common. We both believe in individual rights, tolerance of individual differences, and dislike government prescription of religion. The basic difference, it seems to me, is the different answers we give to Cain's (with thanks to the Captain - my original version had the corpse asking the question!) famous question: "Am I my brother's keeper?" That's not really my basic bitch against the libertarians though. My real complaint is the same as my complaint against most religion - its premise is a fraud. For those who can't stand to wait for the punchline, I believe that trying to implement libertarian principles leads to tyranny or social disintegration. Demonstrating that takes some historical (and pre-historical) context. For all but the last 15,000 or so of the 100,000 years the human sp