Origin of Covid: The Lab Leak Theory

 

The Lab Leak Theory

On February 19, 2020, The Lancet, among the most respected and influential medical journals in the world, published a statement that roundly rejected the lab-leak hypothesis, effectively casting it as a xenophobic cousin to climate change denialism and anti-vaxxism. Signed by 27 scientists, the statement expressed “solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China” …

Katherine Eban, writing in Vanity Fair, assembles a persuasive case that the notion that covid-19 originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology should be taken very seriously.  One reason that it hasn’t been was that statement in The Lancet.  A second reason was the fact that the Lab origin theory was being promoted mostly by right-wing allies of Donald Trump.  Eban notes:

Thanks to their unprecedented track record of mendacity and race-baiting, Trump and his allies had less than zero credibility. And the practice of funding risky research via cutouts like EcoHealth Alliance enmeshed leading virologists in conflicts of interest at the exact moment their expertise was most desperately needed.

The statement in The Lancet was accompanied by the usual assertion that the authors had no conflicting interest.  This was not true, and in fact, the organizer of the statement was head of the EcoHealth Alliance, a major funder of the lab in Wuhan.  The fact that The Lancet statement failed to adduce significant evidence in favor of its claim aroused suspicion in motley bunch of critics.  They, and others, assembled the case, which, I think, includes the following.

1.      The principal alternative, that the virus originated in a Wuhan “wet market” fails because the most likely animal reservoirs of similar viruses were not native to the area and not sold in that marketplace.

2.      The Wuhan lab in question is one of only three in the world carrying out so-called “gain of function” research, in which viruses are deliberately modified to change their infectivity.  Research there included genetic modification of mice to have human like lungs to test the ability of airborne viruses to infect them.

3.      After a bat virus killed several Chinese miners who were removing bat guano from a cave, Wuhan investigators obtained virus samples from the cave and bats, but China failed to report this information to the World Health Organization (WHO) as was their responsibility and obscured the record of the incident.

4.      The prestigious head of the lab has lied about the military research going on at the lab.

5.      Three researchers at the lab fell ill with Covid like symptoms many months before the infection spread to the public.

6.      China has hidden this fact and systematically obstructed investigations of the lab and virus origins.

7.      WHO investigation of virus origins were superficial and China controlled who was permitted to investigate.  The US lacked standing to investigate because our feckless President had pulled us out of WHO.

I found the article fascinating and compelling.  The fact that both the US and the Chinese military were funding the research of the lab is bizaare.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anti-Libertarian: re-post

The most pointed critique of social security and liberalism in general is the libertarian critique. The problem with libertarians, for a liberal, is that we have too much in common. We both believe in individual rights, tolerance of individual differences, and dislike government prescription of religion. The basic difference, it seems to me, is the different answers we give to Cain's (with thanks to the Captain - my original version had the corpse asking the question!) famous question: "Am I my brother's keeper?" That's not really my basic bitch against the libertarians though. My real complaint is the same as my complaint against most religion - its premise is a fraud. For those who can't stand to wait for the punchline, I believe that trying to implement libertarian principles leads to tyranny or social disintegration. Demonstrating that takes some historical (and pre-historical) context. For all but the last 15,000 or so of the 100,000 years the human spec...
Read more

Uneasy Lies The Head

Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown ........... Shakespeare Henry IV, Part II. So it is with us and our slightly distant primate cousins , so it seems. A 9-year study of wild baboons in Kenya by Princeton University and the Institute of Primate Research may turn conventional assumptions of alphas males upside down. The study found that alpha males have high testosterone levels, which allows them to dominate other baboons, get access to more food, and attract better mates. This is expected. Surprisingly, though, the alpha males also have high levels of stress hormone glucocorticoid, which scientists measured from their feces samples. In fact, the stress of alpha baboons was on par with low-ranking baboons. The convention wisdom is that access to food and females provides life security and thus less stress for dominant males. Conversely, weak males who are constantly threatened by starvation and physical violence from stronger males are thought to be more stressed. The st...
Read more

We Call it Soccer

The US played its best, and maybe only good game of World Cup, but lost thanks to brilliant goalkeeping by the Swedish keeper and the bizarre method soccer uses to settle ties when three US stars could not put the ball on frame from the 12 yard spot.  At the end it came down to a blocked shot that spun in by maybe a couple of centimeters. Well, that's football - too much like life.   Which brings me to a modest proposal.  Replace the thirty minute overtimes with as many 7-player 15 minute periods as needed to settle it.  Scoring should be much easier with fewer players.
Read more