Malthus and the Disintegration of Empires.

 

Book Pre-Review: 

War and Peace and War: The Rise and Fall of Empires

by Peter Turchin 

Peter Turchin styles himself as a latter day Hari Selden – he is looking for theories of Cliodynamics - general principles of history.  Two big principles animate his War and Peace and War.  One is due to the great Arab historian and polymath Ibn Khaldun.  Khaldun identified the crucial role of asabiya – the fundamental social glue that unites a people – in the stability of nations and empires.  The second is the role of Malthusian cycles in the instability of empires.

The basic idea of the Malthusian cycle is that peace and prosperity lead to growth in the numbers of the peasant class.  This leads to competition for land, increases in rents, decreases in pay for landless laborers and increased prosperity for the nobles and other rentiers, which, in turn, leads to an expansion of the Noble class.  The peasants and laborers suffer starvation, plague, and the other apocalyptic catastrophes leading to collapse of their numbers.  Now it is the turn of the newly bloated upper class to take their turn in the Malthusian meat grinder.  Rents collapse so less and less is there to be shared by more and more.  Internal strife and external war plunge the nation into internal discord, destroying the social capital of asabiya.

If this sounds like classic predator-pray dynamics, it is.  Turchin studied beetles before he turned to humans, but he has the numbers, for England, France, Rome, and other imperial nations.

One more ingredient comes from computer models of trade and inheritance:  trade and inheritance produce inequality, the so-called Mathew Principle.  The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer, statistically speaking.  In the most potent days of the Roman Republic, the rich Romans had about 5 times the wealth of the median.  By the collapse, that ratio had grown to 200,000.  For comparison, today Jeff Bezos has something like three million times the wealth of the median American.

Is it any wonder that American asabiya is collapsing?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anti-Libertarian: re-post

The most pointed critique of social security and liberalism in general is the libertarian critique. The problem with libertarians, for a liberal, is that we have too much in common. We both believe in individual rights, tolerance of individual differences, and dislike government prescription of religion. The basic difference, it seems to me, is the different answers we give to Cain's (with thanks to the Captain - my original version had the corpse asking the question!) famous question: "Am I my brother's keeper?" That's not really my basic bitch against the libertarians though. My real complaint is the same as my complaint against most religion - its premise is a fraud. For those who can't stand to wait for the punchline, I believe that trying to implement libertarian principles leads to tyranny or social disintegration. Demonstrating that takes some historical (and pre-historical) context. For all but the last 15,000 or so of the 100,000 years the human spec...
Read more

Uneasy Lies The Head

Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown ........... Shakespeare Henry IV, Part II. So it is with us and our slightly distant primate cousins , so it seems. A 9-year study of wild baboons in Kenya by Princeton University and the Institute of Primate Research may turn conventional assumptions of alphas males upside down. The study found that alpha males have high testosterone levels, which allows them to dominate other baboons, get access to more food, and attract better mates. This is expected. Surprisingly, though, the alpha males also have high levels of stress hormone glucocorticoid, which scientists measured from their feces samples. In fact, the stress of alpha baboons was on par with low-ranking baboons. The convention wisdom is that access to food and females provides life security and thus less stress for dominant males. Conversely, weak males who are constantly threatened by starvation and physical violence from stronger males are thought to be more stressed. The st...
Read more

We Call it Soccer

The US played its best, and maybe only good game of World Cup, but lost thanks to brilliant goalkeeping by the Swedish keeper and the bizarre method soccer uses to settle ties when three US stars could not put the ball on frame from the 12 yard spot.  At the end it came down to a blocked shot that spun in by maybe a couple of centimeters. Well, that's football - too much like life.   Which brings me to a modest proposal.  Replace the thirty minute overtimes with as many 7-player 15 minute periods as needed to settle it.  Scoring should be much easier with fewer players.
Read more