Now that classes are over, what intellectual stimulation I get comes from books and jigsaw puzzles. A few books I have been reading.
John Grisham, The Reckoning: A murder/tragedy in three acts. The main character walks into a church and guns down the popular preacher. The central character is a war hero whose travails as soldier, prisoner of war, and guerilla fighter in the Philippines after the Japanese invasion form the core part one. A why done it.
Isaac Asimov, Foundation: I found this science fiction classic pretty boring. The hard science is either magic or overcome by events, character development is nil, and tense standoffs resolved by Deux Ex Machina.
Dan Simmons, Hyperion and The Fall of Hyperion: Two self-contained volumes of a four volume series. The reference to Keats in the titles of the book is not incidental. Keats and his poetry are prominently mentioned. The first volume is structured as a series of Cantos, pilgrims’ stories modeled after the Canterbury Tales. The pilgrims in this case are off to confront a horrible menace known as the Shrike. The tales themselves vary from gripping to tedious. The author has a nice inventive flair in world conjuring, which sometimes is just distracting.
The second volume has a strong cyberpunk flavor which I tend to find tedious.
William Gibson, Neuromancer: The original cyberpunk novel. A punk superhacker battles an oligarchic conspiracy. Has its moments, but not really my cup of tea. My computer tech’s favorite book.
William Gibson, Agency: I guess I like Neuro enough to go back for more. The theme here is an artificial intelligence with agency as background to the adventures of more conventional humans operating in linked world lines.
Phillip Armitage, The Astrophysics of Planet Formation, 2nd ed: OK, this is a textbook, but if you ever want a detailed discussion of the surprisingly intricate story of how quintillions of micron sized particles come together to make a planet, this is it. Thanks to spacecraft explorations of asteroids, comets and planets, the discovery of thousands of exoplanets and protoplanetary nebulae, and generations of careful analysis of meteorites, we now know a great deal about this process, though important mysteries remain. Lots of stability analysis of the Navier-Stokes equations and discussion of numerical simulations. You should have a nodding acquaintance with partial differential equations to fully appreciate, but there is also lots of plain text explanation of what is going on.
(To be continued)
Popular posts from this blog
Alexander at 30 something grieved that there were no more world's to conquer. Robbert Dijkgraaf writing in Quanta, asks whether physics has reached that sad state. While he concludes in the negative, his denial sounds more like "hey, we can still add a few decimal points here and there." Lubos Motl and Peter Woit both have commentaries up today, and Lubos is predictably outraged at his one time coauthor, and Peter is more measured. The Universe still has some puzzles for us of course, but it is not clear that their understanding will have the same kinds of revolutionary import that the discoveries of Newton, Maxwell, Einstein and the quantum theorists have had. In particular, the Cosmos is starting to feel a bit cramped. Of course it is indeed large beyond our imaginings, but there don't seem to be dragons out there, or at least not dragons that we don't already know about. Black holes, quasars, gamma ray bursters all seem to fit pretty neatly under known la
In an earlier comment, William Connolley wrote that he thought the US was "wealthist but not racist." I want to assure him that he is quite wrong. The history of racism in the US started with slavery but continued with Jim Crow. The cardinal principle of Jim Crow was denying blacks the right to vote. This policy was ensured by law and violence, with widespread lynching being the go to sanction. The passage of the voting rights act during the 1960's was the first solid hole in this policy, and it turned the South from solidly Democratic to solidly Republican. Ever since, the Republican Party has depended on racist support for it core voters. The scumbags of the Republican Supreme court gutted the Voting Rights Act, and ever since the Republican Party has made a career of suppressing the black vote. Techniques today are a bit more subtle than in the hay day of the KKK - burdensome voter registration rules, placing voting sites far from predominantly Black neighborho
I am arguing with Connolley again. The occasion is his review ( http://mustelid.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-tyranny-of-merit.html ) of a book called the Tyranny of Merit. It's not likely to be a book I would read, because I'm a lot more concerned about the tyranny of folly. Dr. Connolley, and perhaps the author, manage to wander into the thorny philosophical territory of the meaning of value, justice, and merit. Can we say anything about these except that opinions differ? Connolley: " The assertion (p 136) that Hayek doesn't understand that things other than market value, have value, is drivel. So what we get is a fatal problem for his theory: market value isn't moral worth. His answer (again, p 136) is to take market value as a proxy for social contribution, which is lying worthy of Plato. In his version, free-market liberalism differs from meritocracy. In mine, it doesn't." Dr. C tends to get a bit vituperative, which tends to have a bad effect on me,